Why municipal asset management projects fail—and how to fix them
Over the next decade, hundreds of billions of dollars will be spent on infrastructure across Canada to close the $270 billion deficit. Yet, experts estimate that three-quarters of municipal asset management projects will suffer from scheduling delays or cost overruns. For municipalities—especially small to medium-sized ones—navigating these challenges is no easy feat.
From budget constraints to interdepartmental silos, several common pitfalls lead to stalled or failed infrastructure investments.
Understanding these asset management challenges is the first step toward overcoming them.
Table of Contents
Municipal asset management challenges
Every municipality embarks on an asset management practice with the best of intentions to deliver long-term value and take advantage of greater reliability in their decision-making.
However, there are often unforeseen challenges that arise that prevent municipalities from reaping the benefits of strategic asset management.
The most common challenges municipalities face include:
1. Project complexity
Municipalities must manage a wide range of assets, from roads and bridges to water systems and public buildings. This complexity often overwhelms internal staff, especially when they lack specialized training in asset management.
Without the right expertise, projects quickly become inefficient, mismanaged, or abandoned.
2. A step-by-step process that falls apart
A successful asset management initiative requires a structured approach: compiling an asset inventory, assessing asset conditions, and, most important of all, clearly defining and communicating the desired outcomes. If even one step is incomplete or inaccurate, the entire project is at risk.
Without a clear framework, municipalities struggle to maintain consistency and progress.
3. Lack of interdepartmental collaboration
Asset management projects require collaboration across multiple municipal departments, each with different priorities.
If key stakeholders aren’t aligned on goals and strategies, decision-making stalls. Without consensus, projects often get bogged down in bureaucracy or abandoned altogether.
4. Budget constraints and resource limitations
Many municipalities, particularly small and mid-sized municipalities, face financial limitations, forcing them to assign critical projects to already overburdened staff.
This often leads to delays, incomplete implementations, and poor long-term investment decisions. Without a structured approach to prioritization, essential infrastructure upgrades may be overlooked.
5. Adoption and training challenges
Even when the right tools are in place, municipal staff often lack the time or willingness to adopt new technology. Learning curves, outdated workflows, and resistance to change can hinder implementation, leaving asset management projects stuck in limbo.
6. A shortage of well-trained professionals
The lack of trained asset management professionals—especially in rural municipalities—makes it difficult to implement best practices.
Without the right expertise, decision-making is inconsistent, reactive, and prone to costly errors.
The secret to success: Asset Investment Planning (AIP)
Despite these challenges, municipalities don’t have to accept failure as the norm.
Asset Investment Planning (AIP) offers a structured, data-driven approach to managing infrastructure investments. By integrating financial planning, risk analysis, and long-term scenario modeling, AIP helps municipalities:
✅ Prioritize investments based on risk and budget constraints
✅ Build consensus across departments with clear, data-backed decisions
✅ Streamline workflows and improve staff efficiency
✅ Reduce reliance on individual expertise with AI-driven insights
With the right tools and strategy, municipalities can turn asset management challenges into opportunities—ensuring infrastructure investments deliver long-term value to their communities.
